22nd July 2025

The session was run in the related miro board.

📽️ The meeting recording can be found here.

Participants

Name	Role	Attendance
Samuel Leathers	Chair	Yes
Lorenzo Bruno	Secretary	No
Alexandre Maaza	Voting Seat (Vice-Chair Appointee)	No
Juan Sierra	Voting Seat	Yes
Yoram Ben-Zvi	Voting Seat	No
Alexa C. (Thyme Studio)	Voting Seat	Yes
James Meidinger	Voting Seat	Yes
Christian Schmitz	Voting Seat	No
Giorgio Zinetti	Voting Seat	No
Samir Idris	Voting Seat	No

Agenda

• Discuss CPC support for the Dijkstra scope
• Discuss future hard fork planning
• Review actions and updates

  • bylaws voting
  • Product Research X post shared last week
  • Product Research contracts out for signature (5 out of 7)

    • waiting on Prisma reply
  • GMC sync booked
• Product Research – approve UNDP reply
• Review survey to gather more feedback on KPIs – review Thyme Studio’s presentation and feedback

Updates

• Discuss CPC support for the Dijkstra scope

  • The Chair presented the proposed phased Dijkstra rollout and scope, and the Committee supported publishing the scope to the Product Committee website while awaiting TSC feedback.
• Discuss future hard fork planning

  • The Chair reviewed the proposed hard fork planning process, including joint CPC and TSC ownership of scope, community participation through the Hard Fork Working Group, and different funding paths based on engineering effort.
• Review actions and updates

  • Bylaws voting

    • The Chair reminded eligible Committee members to complete the required KYC process and vote on the bylaws.
  • Product Research X post shared last week

    • No discussion for this topic was held.
  • Product Research contracts out for signature (5 out of 7)

    • The Committee was informed that five of the seven Product Research contracts had been sent for signature, with the remaining two dependent on outstanding matters concerning UNDP and Prisma.
  • Waiting on Prisma reply

    • The Committee was informed that a reply from Prisma remained outstanding before its Product Research contract could progress.
  • GMC sync booked

    • No discussion for this topic was held.
• Product Research

  • Approve UNDP reply

    • The Committee reviewed UNDP’s response regarding the removal of a team member from its proposal and agreed that the change was procedural and could progress.
• Review survey to gather more feedback on KPIs

  • Review Thyme Studio’s presentation and feedback

    • The Committee reviewed the proposed KPI feedback survey, discussed its structure, length, timing and distribution, and supported progressing it with minor adjustments before sharing it with other committees.

Outcomes & Recommendations

N/A

Decisions Recorded

N/A